fastfinge reviewed Classic Video Games by Brian R. Eddy
Review of 'Classic Video Games' on 'Goodreads'
2 stars
This was too short, and did not contain nearly enough details.
I'm a completely blind reader of LitRPG, progression fantasy, science fiction, fantasy, and some nonfiction. Interact with me @fastfinge@iceshrimp.social as well as here.
Some important warnings:This link opens in a pop-up window
This was too short, and did not contain nearly enough details.
It has been nineteen years since Kenneth C. Davis first dazzled audiences with his instant classic Don't Know Much About® …
Historian Donald L. Miller offers The Story of World War II, an expanded and updated …
I really enjoyed this book; it presented not only a picture of what it was like for the people on the ground, but also did a good job of giving a picture of the overall war, and putting all of the battles in context.
The internet hype machine indicates that this is some of the worst writing ever printed in book form. Now that it's available as an ebook, I decided to pick it up, ready to be amused. My reaction was...blah. I've come across much, much worse writing. Yes, it's silly and unoriginal. But I can name you dozens of fantasy series that are silly, badly plotted, and unoriginal. Same goes for characterization: lots of books get this wrong, and Gloria Tesch is no worse than some other self-published authors that have crossed my path. Sure, the writing is stilted, but it isn't stilted enough to be particularly amusing. In short, Gloria Tesch's awful promotional techniques, internet drama, movie and theme park delusions, and Youtube clips are all much more amusing in their badness than are her actual books.
This book is so dated as to be useless to the casual reader. While the cases it presents may still be interesting for those in the profession to analyze, people reading from a less professional perspective will find nothing of any worth. This book is so full of horrifying 1970's style racism (comparing "savages" to children and "retards" and "simpletons", calling cases retardeds, simpletons, idiots, and worse, etc) that while some of the information may still be valid today, I cannot take a single word of it seriously. If the author took the time to read and write a forward for the audio edition, why on earth didn't he take the time to go through the text, and at least update some of the worst blunders? Yes, I realize time and language have changed. But that's no reason to perpetuate historical mistakes in what is sold as a popular psych …
This book is so dated as to be useless to the casual reader. While the cases it presents may still be interesting for those in the profession to analyze, people reading from a less professional perspective will find nothing of any worth. This book is so full of horrifying 1970's style racism (comparing "savages" to children and "retards" and "simpletons", calling cases retardeds, simpletons, idiots, and worse, etc) that while some of the information may still be valid today, I cannot take a single word of it seriously. If the author took the time to read and write a forward for the audio edition, why on earth didn't he take the time to go through the text, and at least update some of the worst blunders? Yes, I realize time and language have changed. But that's no reason to perpetuate historical mistakes in what is sold as a popular psych book, especially not when the author is alive and well and could update the text.
I wish Goodreads let us give books half-stars; 3 stars feels like not enough, and 4 stars feels like way too many. So pretend that I gave this book 3.5 stars.
In short: the start of this book is 4 out of 5, the middle bits are 5 out of 5, and the end is about 3 out of 5.
I'll start with the good things. Once you get used to her, Jenny Lawson is extremely funny. The start of the book kind of feels like she's trying too hard, but as you keep reading, you start to realize it isn't the case; I'm pretty sure that's just who she is in real life.
Surprisingly, Jenny is at her best when writing about more serious issues like friendship, sickness, and the babies she lost. She manages to handle these issues in her trademark style, without getting extraordinarily depressing, or being …
I wish Goodreads let us give books half-stars; 3 stars feels like not enough, and 4 stars feels like way too many. So pretend that I gave this book 3.5 stars.
In short: the start of this book is 4 out of 5, the middle bits are 5 out of 5, and the end is about 3 out of 5.
I'll start with the good things. Once you get used to her, Jenny Lawson is extremely funny. The start of the book kind of feels like she's trying too hard, but as you keep reading, you start to realize it isn't the case; I'm pretty sure that's just who she is in real life.
Surprisingly, Jenny is at her best when writing about more serious issues like friendship, sickness, and the babies she lost. She manages to handle these issues in her trademark style, without getting extraordinarily depressing, or being particularly offensive.
If you read this book in print, I kind of pity you. The audio edition is entirely worth the price. Although I must admit that I purchased my copy from audible for $5. But those of you reading the print book, instead of listening to it as Delivered by the author herself, missed a lot. First of all, Jenny feels the need to sing every chapter heading, for some strange reason that I really don't understand. This does add something to the book, although I'm not sure quite what. Second, she's an entirely natural sounding reader, giving the audiobook a conversational feel that I suspect would be missing from letters on a page. Third, some of the included sound effects were just so silly that they made me laugh in and of themselves. Fourth, the five or so minutes of bonus outtakes at the end were worth it, if only to convince me that Jenny Lawson really is who the book makes her out to be. But I'm glad they were saved for the end, because if I had tried to play that drinking game, I would be dead. The only criticisms I have of the audio are that the narration sounds really unnatural when she's trying to read her footnotes, and that her voice sounds a bit like she's 13. Hearing someone who sounds 13 say the word Vagina that many times is just a little disconcerting at first. Even though it's been 2 days since I finished the book, I've heard the word Vagina so often that it still sounds like nonsense.
Okay, now I'm going to move on to the stuff that I didn't like. First off, keep in mind that I don't suffer from any kind of anxiety disorder, and don't have a lot of experience with it. Also, I don't have a vagina. I suspect that makes my reaction quite different from those who are coping with anxiety, or do have a vagina. The best way I can articulate the problem is that I felt like I was laughing at the author, not with her. Especially in the chapter when she was discussing anxiety disorder directly, I would find myself belly-laughing. Then I would stop, realize this is a serious problem, and wonder if I should really be laughing at it. But the writing is so funny that it sets you up to laugh, even if you suspect that you shouldn't. I ran into that discomfort repeatedly throughout the book, realizing that I was laughing at something serious (poor parenting, female issues, etc) that I had no experience with, and wondering if that made me an insensitive person. If you're a female with anxiety disorder, I doubt you'll have this reaction at all, though you could be totally offended.
My second problem with the book is that it seems to drag on far too long. By about the three quarter mark, I was getting ready for the end, but it never seemed to come! Some of the visits home could have been cut, or shortened, without really taking anything away from the book. They just felt like the same humour, repeated with only slightly different events. Once again though, this could have had something to do with how I read the book. Me and my girlfriend sat down to listen to the audiobook in two marathon sittings, and by half way through the second one, we were both thinking about what book we wanted to read together next. I suspect that if I had read each chapter in the context of a blog, at one chapter per day, I might not have had this problem. It might just be a case of Lawson overload. If you have the time and ability, I recommend pacing yourself, and reading only 1 or 2 chapters per day. I suspect it'll be funnier that way.
This book didn't teach me anything I didn't already know. However, if you're new to the subject, this is a good overview that you should be able to finish in one or two sittings.
A brief history of the United States, that served as a good review of things everyone should know, American or not. It also contains many interesting facts that I didn't already know.
When I initially purchased this audiobook, I didn't realize it used multiple readers for the various characters. For the most part, with one notable exception, they all did an excellent job, and the different voices added a lot to the reading.
I decided to read this book after having watched the movie. While their are a lot of things in the book that were skipped over for the movie, I don't find that makes the book better. The book and movie each stand alone, and serve different purposes. The movie does a better job at telling a tightly plotted story with a point. However, the book does a better job at painting a true, full picture of the characters and setting. But for the most part, if you enjoyed the movie, you'll like the book just as well, for different reasons. If you enjoyed the book, give the movie a …
When I initially purchased this audiobook, I didn't realize it used multiple readers for the various characters. For the most part, with one notable exception, they all did an excellent job, and the different voices added a lot to the reading.
I decided to read this book after having watched the movie. While their are a lot of things in the book that were skipped over for the movie, I don't find that makes the book better. The book and movie each stand alone, and serve different purposes. The movie does a better job at telling a tightly plotted story with a point. However, the book does a better job at painting a true, full picture of the characters and setting. But for the most part, if you enjoyed the movie, you'll like the book just as well, for different reasons. If you enjoyed the book, give the movie a try; it doesn't mangle the basic story at all.
At first, I thought that this book would appeal mostly to language geeks, the kind of people who speak 11 languages, and are working on number 12. Fortunately, I decided to give it a chance, even though I'm not at all that sort of person. The appeal of this book is much, much wider than just polyglots and linguists. If you're interested in nonsense in the style of Lewis Carroll or Edward Lear, you should read this book. If you're interested in wordplay, you should read this book. If you're interested in the inner workings of interactive fiction, text adventure, and mud parsers, you should read this book. If you're a wannabe writer or speaker, you should read this book. If, like me, you're interested in all of the above, you'll probably be reading this book a second time at some point in the future.
This is another book in the Black Jack series. It won't stand alone, so unless you're already up to date on these books, don't bother. If you are keeping up with them, and enjoyed the last one, this one continues where it left off. The writing is as good as ever, and the characters are the same. I'm starting to feel kind of trapped in an endless saga, though. But that doesn't mean I can bring myself to stop reading. Be warned, once again, this book has no real ending. Just an opening for the next book.
The writing style of this book makes it obvious just how dated these stories are. Do not go into this expecting political correctness; the way other cultures are portrayed is, while mostly harmless, utterly outdated. I was surprised, however, about just how many of these facts I already know from other sources to be correct. A few from The Straight Dope, but many, many others were plot points in Science Fiction I have previously read. It makes me wonder just how much of an influence, intended or otherwise, these cartoons were on scifi authors of the 1950's.